Here’s an idea: Let’s lay out the rules for this point forward, and let’s hold everyone to that standard. Let's call out those who have been given a pass up until now.
A) When there are rumors that someone is sending homoerotic emails to an underling, anyone who hears the rumors should___________.
B) When someone has sex with an underling while in office they should______?
C) When someone in congress has a gay prostituion ring running out of their house they should_________?
D) When a sitting congressman actually has sex with a page (not just emails, but actual man-boy sex, those sitting in congress who know about it should_______?
If you are willing to fill in the blanks and live by it in the future, and take a stand on the past, then by all means we should condemn Reynolds for “not doing more”.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
1 comment:
Typical wing-nut blurring of the issue. Sure, have sex with a minor or non consensual sex and suffer the consequences. But to spend millions in a witch hunt to expose a consensual blow job-they should be booted as well.
Reynolds covered up and took $100k from Foley to keep quiet-he gets the boot! I love how his ad say 'HE forced him to resign.' Voters have seen through this liar-he's gone. Rove knew and even threatened Foley if he did not run for re-election.
The Republicans are done and good riddance!
Post a Comment